Category: Entrepreneurship

  • Ein Post, den ich eh schreiben wollte.

    Je suis dans le news.

    Momentan sehe ich die folgenden Makro-Trends, ohne auf einzelnes einzugehen: Online-Offline ist ein Thema, das immer besser umgesetzt wird, wobei sich Startups auf die Nischen konzentrieren müssen, die nicht von den Big Boys wie Google und Groupon angegangen werden. Big Data in allen Bereichen wird immer wichtiger, und erlaubt noch viel Innovation. Die Software”-isierung” von klassischen Technologien wird fortschreiten, und alles geht in die Cloud.

    Mein Interview auf Seedfinance.de: Philipp Möhring von Seedcamp: “Entscheidend ist die ökonomische Logik und internationale Skalierbarkeit!”.

  • VC vs startup career – Quora blogging

    As many others, I’m becoming addicted to Quora – loads of deep and good information and insights on interesting topics.

    Here’s my (admittedly biased) answer to the question “What’s the case for working as an associate at an early stage venture capital firm rather than a startup?

    Some of the skills you develop at an early stage investor are very similar to what you do in a startup – and some are very different.

    Why would you work for a venture investor in the first place?

    • You get tons of exposure to what is happening in the market. There is no better way of developing an overview of trends and movements than at an early stage VC.
    • You are actually working in a startup yourself. Early stage firms are small teams, have limited amounts of capital, need to be very flexible, and require massive amounts of work – that’s very similar to a startup. You are project managing, recruiting, marketing, developing website and similar things – for your own firm and for all of your portfolio.
    • There is no better way to build a network – no matter if you want to startup yourself or want to continue being an investor.
    • You are not dialling for dollars (cold calling potential investments), because early stage firms work different than later stage – you have to meet people. Also, to understand businesses in the early stages is totally different than looking at numbers and growth rates in established businesses.
    • An associate role is much less analytical and theoretical than in a large fund, and usually much less business/finance focused. This is the case for most of the folks in early stage though: you need to have a very good grasp of operations to run successful investments (more hands on, advice, etc in early stage than later).

    (a lot of these answers coincide with the original answer, also check back there)

    Why would you not start a startup instead?

    You need some different skills than as a founder. It’s a great job (the best, in my eyes), but definitely not an easy one.

    • You need to handle 10-30 different companies, understand different markets, have totally diverse contacts, and a good overview of all of this.
    • Skills include much more of broad knowledge, less specific and deep domain expertise. For some, this comes more naturally.
    • You might be on the look out to start something longer term, with a lot of insights.
    • You have ADD, in which case the dynamic nature of the job fits your personality really well.

    Negatives:

    You have to say “no” a lot. It could make you hesitant of starting your own (but then, why are you in the startup world).

    Depending on the firm, you can get used to a lot of money coming your way, resulting in the same challenges you have as a consultant or banker: It is really hard to start a company after getting used to a paycheck.

    I am an associate for Seedcamp in London, a micro seed fund in London. Above reflects my own experience, so feel free to deduce from that.

  • Tell us a story, please!

    It’s quite amazing how many founders and company leaders are making amazing new technical solutions or products but seem to have difficulty explaining the core narrative of the product themselves. Now, if the person who built the product has a hard time explaining it, then just imagine how hard it is for others to understand it – let alone promote it.

    via Why defining your company narrative and creating a ‘social object’ is important. | Henrik Werdelin.

    This is what makes a good pitch a great pitch (or a pitch you understand at all). Make a pitch a story and it pulls your audience right through.

  • Never be pitchin’

    On the “VCs turned Entrepreneurs” panel (subtitle “actually Entrepreneurs turned VCs turned Entrepreneurs”) at Mini Seedcamp London last week, Max Niederhofer let lose some of his wisdom regarding the perpetually pitching entrepreneur. In his view, instead of “always be closing“, Entrepreneurs should never be pitching investors out right. Instead, a “oh, we are moving along quite well, but we aren’t looking for funding right now” might go a lot further in piquing the investor’s interest.

    Now, I am all for game mechanics, behavioral economics, and bashing people with lots of money, but I don’t think the reason for this to work lies in the ever greedy VC that just wants to be part of a good deal.

    Rather, I think that a very big problem – especially for early stage companies – is that they are new to the game and want to pitch everything that has two legs and wears khakis. Don’t get me wrong, this is what entrepreneurs need to do – sell their stuff to others, be it customers, employees or investors. BUT, and this is a big fat but (think 2 Life Crew big), you do not want to burn any bridges or be in the wrong pile of a VCs business plan collection. If you talk to the wrong VC too early, he sees what you are doing, puts his mental model on it and writes you off as “too early”, “no traction”, or “I don’t get it”. I think these are all valid reasons to put you in a pile for, but only if you are actually pitching what the VC thinks you are pitching.

    Why is this important?

    VCs live by dealflow. They need to see absolutely every last deal out there – after all, it is their job to find the proverbial needle in the haystack. VCs also live by their funnel. If the haystack is the dealflow, The finding part is narrowing down the investment opportunities to the best and last one. So – when you are in a VCs dealflow, you are being evaluated as an investment opportunity, whether you like it or not. As soon as you pitch to an investor – even if you both know that you are too early or too young or in the wrong geography, he puts on his dealflow glasses (actual X-ray glasses) and tries to find out if he would invest in your company. He most likely wouldn’t – after all, you are just trying to get some feedback on your business model or market sizing – but once he thought about you in this way, you are out.

    This is why early strage entrepreneurs need to make sure they take their time in pitching to later stage investors, and this is why you should not tell people too much about your fundraising situation too early. If you can get along with the “not fundraising right now”, you might actually be able to make a connection to the person you are talking to, without burning the bridge by asking for the wrong thing. You should absolutely try to get into a conversation with your potential investor and show him the nice way that you understand your business model and market. Ask for input, ask for intros, but don’t pitch too early. Trust me, even the VC will be annoyed being pitched the 5th seed deal at an event when it is quite obvious that he only does later stage. Also – once you have established a couple of ties with people in the investment community, it is a lot easier to actually fundraise when you need to.

    But I need the money!

    Of course, you need to pitch investors like there’s no tomorrow as soon as you need to close a round (start 6 months earlier). However, if you took the right precautions and already know a couple of great people that give you lots of input, it is a much easier to say “we want to take this to the next level – are you in?”. In my opinion, it is very important to be out there and let people know about your business so you are not a totally new face when it comes to your round. When you are able to show people that you know how to turn corners, pivot, and close gaps they identify in your strategy, they will trust you much more as an entrepreneur. And if you have never formally pitched them before, they are only now really seeing you as an investment opportunity – and you can start on the top of their pile. The right pile.

  • So entrepreneurship IS rocket science

    At the end of the day, I’ve really come to believe that you can’t predict success based on where a missile is pointed pre-launch.  Instead you have to assess the quality of the targeting system (the team) and the density/size of targets (the market). And hope that the missile you launch finds a true target – rather than a decoy…

    via Redeye VC: Founders and Heat Seeking Missiles.

    Pretty good post by Josh Kopelman about pivoting – in the right direction.

  • My presentation at Imperial College last week

    I had the chance to present Seedcamp at the annual IED business plan competition at Imperial College last week. This competition brings together MBA students from Imperial and designers and others from schools such as the Royal College of Arts to develop a business idea and take it to market. The quality of pitches was very high – also the real world applicability of most businesses was very apparent.

    We saw teams that presented mobile health insurance (through an MVNO setting) in Africa, a coffee machine taking unroasted beans as an input (dying for a sample machine!), cardboard wheels to lug heavy objects (hello ikea), plants and mechanics combined to provide air conditioning (the charismatic winning team), and smart metering technology (focused on design and user experience). No internet businesses, but they listened to my presentation anyways: